1. Mine: my initial response is that she’s lying because she’s been using Bill to help her campaign, which is a really smart idea so she shouldn’t deny it. Also I like her ending joke about cleaning up after the Bushes.
Roomates: Initial response is that she did a good job of trying to convince people she doesn’t want to be judged by her husband’s accomplishments
2. Mine: It’s emotional because I’m annoyed that she is trying to deny using Bill as a political weapons, I think it’s the right thing for her to do but she shouldn’t deny it.
Roomates: Intellectual because he follows the presidential race closely and thinks he is making the decision because of stuff he’s previously thought
3. Mine: It’s organized by her answering what I’m assuming was a questions to her, which most politicians don’t do, and then making a little joke at the end of it.
Roomates: It’s organized well because she gets her point across but then changes the subject on her own terms
4. Mine: The author wants us to believe that she is not using her husband as a political weapons and wants to be judge solely on what she has done
Roomates: Thinks that Hillary wants us to think she is qualified for presidency because of the stuff she has done
5. Mine: The thesis is Hillary Clinton wants the public to look at her accomplishments not her husbands
Roomates: said pretty much the same thesis I had
6. Neither of us could figure out what genre this would go into
7. We both know about this object because of the new following the elections
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment